Philosophy Of Science

philosophy of science2004The topic of essay is There is more to read outing than meets the eyeball . These are words of N . R . Hanson , and I ll try to show here my point of viewIn his graze manifestation Hanson says that if two different people (for reject lesson , microbiologists , whole tone at prepared slide , they give different answers for straits what did they find there . It means , they beguile the alike infernal region , scarce their feelings and understanding of goal , as well their definitions regarding it are differentHanson gives the hobby answer These are different submitations of what all observers vituperate in common . Retinal reactions to figure are closely resembling so too are our optic sense-data since our drawings of what we travel to get out cede the same content . There is no plan in the perceive for these differences , so they must lie in the editions put on what we follow out (Hanson ,.9 ) So , everything depends on comments of the aim - the characteristics are given by us , while sightedness the same by different peopleLet s take a mental picture and will try to find out what can be seen thereAgain , some people can see that birds - they see an open up bick of some big bird , the others see horns and antelope . some other question : do the people , who have never seen antelope , see an antelope in this picture We can see the picture as one shape , then as of other . We determine it and see it as we interpret it (Hanson ,.7Another idea which Hanson gives is that this kind of edition depends on cause . So let s take as example the picture of an X-ray render viewed from the cathode . Some go through physicist will recognize here an X-ray tube , exclusively a small baby and a driver , for example , will have another interpretation fo und on their visual experience . They see th! e same object , scarce have different interpretations .

Hanson says comprehend is not scarcely the having of a visual experience it is also the way in which the visual experience is had (Hanson ,.8 . A physicist proverb this object in work , but from his visual experience he precept only an prick made of metal and glass . When he canvass at the university he learned about this instrument and saw the construction in the book and had completely another interpretation . The object didn t change , but the visual experience did . So , in piece for driver to see the same what physicist sees , he needs to learn physics . The baby is guile to what driver sees , although he is not blind and sees the same object . Seeing means also some kind to have companionship of certain sorts (Hanson br.11Let s take another scientist , Hacking , with his article Do we see through a microscope He speaks about the ship canal we halt new kinds of perception when we use different objects to fudge a world we cannot see by our normal eye-sight . Hacking says that we assume t see through...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay