Ethics in Action.

Rex Roofing formed a contract with the ONeills for installation of a new roof on their house. The charge of the contract was $2500. subsequently the take a leak had begun, Rex realized that he was not charging enough for the project and informed the ONeills that he could not recognize it. The ONeills agreed to knuckle under a higher price of $3200. We will, through the analysis of antecedent case precedents, state our opinions as to whether it was ethical for Rex to refuse to do the job at the maestro price, and if the ONeills are ethically compel to pay more than the trustworthy contracted price. Case Precedent #1 Drennan v. spark promotion pavement material Co., 51 Cal. 2d 409 [L. A. No. 25024. In Bank. Dec. 31, 1958.] William Drennan, plaintiff, a licensed general contractor, submitted a implore on the three-card monte Vista School Job for a paving material job. onward Drennan could submit the cutter, Drennan asked for bids from subcontractors to do the paving work. Of all of the subcontractors who submitted bids, wiz paving Co. came in with the lowest bid. jumper cable surface Co. bid the paving job at $7,131.60. Mrs. Johnson, Drennans secretary, repeated the bid to make accredited that the bid amount was correct and was sustain by Mr. Oppenheimer who was asterisk Paving Co.s construction engineer.

Drennan compiled his costs, $317, 385.00 including Star Paving Cos bid on his proposal to Monte Vista School. Drennan told Star Paving Co that if awarded the project, they would be awarded the subcontract. On July 28, 1955, Drennan was awarded the project. The nex t morning, Drennan halt by Star Paving Co. ! and found out that the bid amount was a mistake and the job had to be make at $15,000. Drennan told the subcontractor that the work had to be done... If you want to get a full essay, rules of order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay