Discuss: The ethical problems and issues faced by archaeology in terms of questions like "who owns the past?"

These ethical concerns fall into three broad areas. First, there is the school principal of how to action human remains. Over the past few years, archaeologists picture often come into conflict with indigenous peoples over the durance and handling of excavated human remains. In Belgium and France, where the first-world-war battlefields are dangerous places so far today, with unexploded shells, making excavation a potentially fatal activity, the situation is particularly complex because the allied armies included soldiers from a variety of faiths and ethnicities, including Africans, Indians, Australians and Native Americans, all of whose traditions may prefer to turn to remains differently. Next is the question of ownership of artifacts. In the supposition of first-world-war sites, local people armed with metal detectors routinely wedge in medals and other memorabilia. The sale of such(prenominal) items has provided an important acknowledgment of income ever since re fugees first returned to the area after the conflict. Archaeologists, though, regard such activities as looting. Around the world, the general question of who has the first affirm on buried items local people, the descendants of the original owners or archaeologists is deep controversial. A third ethical problem concerns the delivery of sites. Should battlefields be left alone as memorials, redeveloped for tourism, or uphold for the archaeologists of the future(a)? Archaeologists increasingly consider the third option as in recent years, they have become more selective slightly what and where they dig, so that they do not preclude investigations by consecutive generations. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay